Methods of Teaching Math to student with Mild to Moderate Disabilities

Details:
Select a 3-5 grade level and a corresponding Arizona College and Career Ready Standard or other state standard based on the Number and Operations-Fractions domain.

Compose an aligning learning target and design appropriate activities for a selected group of three to four students, of varying academic levels, from the “Class Profile.”

Complete the Planning and Instruction sections of the COE Lesson Plan Template, making sure the activities are supported by the recommendations found in the IES Practice Guide.

For your differentiated activities, specifically address:

Fraction tasks; including area, length, and set/quantity models; or
Equivalent fractions.
In addition and with the assistance of the IES Practice Guide, complete the Teacher Notes section within your lesson, describing five potential issues and/or roadblocks that might happen while delivering the lesson. Provide possible solutions to each potential issue.

In addition, draft five questions pertaining to the lesson that promote conceptual understandings related to fractions.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

 

*Differentiating Math Activities *

1
No Evidence
0.00%
2
Nominal Evidence
69.00%
3
Unacceptable Evidence
74.00%
4
Acceptable Evidence
87.00%
5
Target Evidence
100.00%
*70.0 %**Content*

*15.0 %* *Lesson Plan Content *
No submission.
Lesson plan does not include learning objectives and instructional
activities related to the Number and Operations-Fractions domain; modifying
and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the
identified academic goal.
Lesson plan includes inappropriate instructional activities related to the
Number and Operations-Fractions domain; modifying and extending skills
taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified academic goal.
Lesson plan includes appropriate instructional activities related to the
Number and Operations-Fractions domain; modifying and extending skills
taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified academic goal.
Lesson plan includes engaging instructional activities related to the
Number and Operations-Fractions domain; modifying and extending skills
taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified academic goal.
*10.0 %* *PLANNING: Instructional Script and Materials*
No submission.
Lesson plan does not use effective, verbal, nonverbal techniques in a way
that would create opportunities for learning and collaboration.
Lesson plan does not adequately address student or class needs, and/or
includes thinly designed use of verbal, nonverbal techniques to create
opportunities for learning and collaboration.
Lesson plan includes basic, appropriate use of student-centered verbal,
nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for learning and collaboration.
Lesson plan demonstrates well-developed and skillful use of effective,
student-centered verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for
active inquiry, collaboration and supportive interaction.
*10.0 %* *PLANNING: Meeting the Varied Learning Needs of Students *
No submission.
Lesson plan instruction and instructional supports ignores the learning
needs of the students.
Lesson plan does not fully differentiate instructional activities and
supports. It inadequately addresses the needs of the students.
Lesson plan includes basic differentiated instructional activities and
supports that are designed to generally meet the needs of students.
Lesson plan has creative, well-developed differentiated instructional
activities and supports clearly designed to meet the needs of specific
individuals or groups with similar needs.
*10.0 %* *PLANNING: Meeting the Language Needs of Students *
No submission.
Planned assessments do not clearly measure the stated learning targets,
and/or do not include modifications for the individual needs of the student.
Lesson plan only cursorily describes content-based vocabulary and includes
underdeveloped instructional support for the use of vocabulary and
additional language demands associated with the language function.
Lesson plan identifies content-based vocabulary and includes general
instructional support for the use of vocabulary and additional language
demands associated with the language function.
Lesson plan clearly and comprehensively incorporates content-based
vocabulary, targeted instructional support for the use of vocabulary, and
additional language demands associated with the language function.
*10.0 %* *Teacher Notes*
No submission.
Teacher notes fail to describe potential issues and/or roadblocks that may
occur in lesson delivery, including appropriate possible solutions to each
issue.
Teacher notes are inadequate describing potential issues and/or roadblocks
that may occur in lesson delivery, including appropriate possible solutions
to each issue.
Teacher notes are adequate describing potential issues and/or roadblocks
that may occur in lesson delivery, including appropriate possible solutions
to each issue.
Teacher notes are thorough describing potential issues and/or roadblocks
that may occur in lesson delivery, including appropriate possible solutions
to each issue.
*15.0 %* *Essential Questions*
No submission.
Essential questions do not promote conceptual understanding related to the
Number and Operations-Fractions domain.
Essential questions that promote conceptual understanding related to the
Number and Operations-Fractions domain are inadequately drafted.
Essential questions that promote conceptual understanding related to the
Number and Operations-Fractions domain are drafted.
Essential questions that promote conceptual understanding related to the
Number and Operations-Fractions domain are expertly drafted.
*20.0 %**Organization and Effectiveness *

*20.0 %* *Mechanics*
No submission.
The lesson plan contains inappropriate, incoherent language and/or sentence
structures.
The lesson plan contains mechanical and conventional errors or non-relevant
language that affects meaning and clarity.
The lesson plan has a few mechanical and conventional errors present that
do not significantly affect meaning or clarity. Word choice reflects basic,
consistent, appropriate use of practice and topic-related language.
The lesson plan is free of mechanical and conventional errors. Word choice
reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language.
*10.0 %**Format*

*10.0 %* *Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment) *
Template is not u appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed
correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A
lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor
errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
*100 %* *Total Weightage*

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s